Monday, May 10, 2021
Italian (Italy)English (United Kingdom)

Desiderio Consultants Ltd. is a think tank and a network of independent professional international development consultants established to promote and influence customs & trade-related policies in African nations to achieve trade facilitation reforms aimed at improving international and regional trade
Creativity, Commitment to Excellence, Results

AfCFTA Dispute Settlement Body goes operational

On 26 April 2021, the first inaugural session of the Dispute Settlement Body was held at the AfCFTA Secretariat. Article 20 of the AfCFTA Agreement establishes an inter-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism applicable to disputes, defined at art. 1, e) as any disagreement between State Parties regarding the interpretation and/or application of the Agreement in relation to their rights and obligations.

The AfCFTA Agreement refers to the Protocol on Rules and Procedures on the Settlement of Disputes for what concerns the administration of such mechanism, which has been basically modeled upon the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, a legal text contained in the Annex 2 of the WTO Agreement that provides the rules for dispute settlement in the WTO.

Typically, in the WTO system, a dispute arises when one WTO Member adopts a trade policy measure that one or more other Members consider to be inconsistent with the obligations set out under the WTO Agreements. The WTO Member or Members that feel aggrieved by the measure are then entitled to activate the WTO dispute settlement system in order to challenge that measure. The first step in this process is an attempt to reach a mutually agreed solution through consultations among parties.

If no settlement of the dispute is achieved within 60 days after the date of receipt of the request for consultations, the complaint is filed to a body composed of representatives of all WTO Members, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Being made up of governmental representatives (in most cases diplomatic delegates of the Trade or the Foreign Affairs Ministries of the WTO Members seconded in Geneva, where the WTO is headquartered), the DSB is a political body. This is why the adjudication of disputes is conferred to one or more panels to be established by the DSB, made up of 3 members (or 5 if the disputing parties require so), whose composition has be agreed by the disputing parties. Differently from the DSB, members of the dispute settling panels must act independently from the governments they represent and must take an objective assessment of the matter and the fact of the case. Their decisions, which are binding for the disputing States, can be appealed before an Appellate Body made up of 7 members nominated by the DSB. 

Similar to the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), the AfCFTA mechanism is a two-tier system comprising a Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), which will assign disputes arisen between African States to specifically appointed Dispute Settlement Panels (Panels) whose decisions can be appealed before an Appellate Body.

Parties to a dispute must first enter into preliminary consultations, with a view to finding an amicable resolution. If the latter is not achieved, the dispute is therefore assigned by the DSB to a panel. However, experience gained from other RECs (most of them having established Courts of Justice), shows that the cases in which African States bring controversies on trade-related matters before a jurisdictional organ are more unique than rare. Those few cases where an African State has been brought before a Court of Justice of a REC for a violation of trade-related provisions contained in the Treaties establishing a REC or other regional regulations, have all been initiated by private parties.

Aware of the poor likelihood by African States to solve their trade disputes through jurisdictional means, the drafters of the AfCFTA Protocol on Rules and Procedures on the Settlement of Disputes have therefore introduced in such text a series of provisions allowing disputing parties to use, in every stage of the dispute, alternative dispute resolution methods such as conciliation, mediation, and  arbitration (art. 4(5)). These systems, which are deeply rooted in the customary African law, rely on ancient tribal practices such as “village elder” judgments within specific ethnic groups. As such, as indicated by professor Alioune Badara Fall (in “Le juge, le justiciable et les pouvoirs publics: pour une appréciation concrète de la place du juge dans les systèmes politiques en Afrique“, 2003), these non-judicial conflict resolution methods in Africa are generally more accepted and benefit from more credibility than judicial systems.

 

 

 

 

 

View Danilo Desiderio's profile on LinkedIn

 

Copyright © 2011

Desiderio Consultants Ltd., Mandera Road, Kileleshwa, Nairobi (KENYA)